The world’s largest corporations have paid $700 billion in monetary penalties linked to regulatory infringements in 45 countries since 2010, according to Violation Tracker Global, a new database created by the U.S. non-governmental organization Good Jobs First.

Major banks, especially those based in the USA and Europe, account for more than one-third of the penalties.

Ninety-five parent companies have received $1bn or more in penalties.

Violation Tracker Global, which builds on previous databases focused on the U.S. and U.K., provides free access to information on corporate misconduct and regulatory infringements worldwide.

“Violation Tracker Global documents a broad spectrum of misconduct by multinational corporations in their global operations,” said Philip Mattera, director of the Violation Tracker project.

“We hope this tool will support corporate accountability initiatives in various countries, including the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive,” he added.

Violation Tracker Global documents over 50,000 regulatory penalties imposed on 1,600 multinational corporations and their subsidiaries by 700 regulatory agencies and courts in the world’s largest economies in both the Global North and the Global South

The cases in Violation Tracker Global are divided into eight broad offense groups: Competition/Antitrust, Consumer Protection, Employment, Environment, Financial, Government Contracting, Healthcare, and Safety.

Each entry is also tagged with one of about 100 more specific offense categories, such as privacy/data protection violations, bribery, money laundering, and workplace safety. Some countries do not disclose data in all these categories.

Entries include additional details, such as a description of the offense, the monetary penalty (both in the original currency and the equivalent in U.S. dollars), and a link back to the information source, which in most cases is the website of the regulatory agency.

The report lists all the countries and jurisdictions covered by Violation Tracker Global, including: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Czech Republic, Denmark, the European Commission, the European Free Trade Association, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the USA, and Vietnam.

Additionally, bribery cases from the African Development Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank, and the World Bank are also included.

Federal government has asked a high court sitting in Abuja to issue a bench warrant for the arrest of Hathiramani Ranesh, managing director of Dana Air.

Mojisola Okeya, counsel to the attorney-general of the federation (AGF), made the oral application on Thursday before Obiora Egwuatu, the presiding judge.

The application followed Ranesh’s absence in court for his arraignment.

The federal government alleged that the managing director has refused to appear for his arraignment in the alleged N1.3 billion fraud

The AGF had filed a six-count charge against Ranesh and two others.

In the charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/101/2021 and filed by Moshood Adeyemi, deputy director of public prosecutions in the office of the AGF and minister of justice, Dana Group PLC and Dana Steel Ltd were joined as second and third defendants respectively.

In the first count, Ranesh, the two businesses, and unidentified individuals were accused of committing a crime on the property of the Dana Steel Rolling Factory in Katsina between September and December of 2018.

They were alleged to have conspired to remove, convert, and sell four units of industrial generators “i.e. three (3) units Ht of 9,000 KVA and 1 unit of 1,000 KVA; all valued at over N450 million, which form part of the Deed of Asset Debenture that were charged as collateral security for a bond issued in your favour, which Deed is still subsisting at all material times”.

In count three, the defendants and others at large were accused of conspiring to fraudulently divert N864 million from House No. 116, Oshodi-Apapa Expressway, Isolo-Lagos, between April 7 and 8, 2014.

The funds were said to be part of Ecobank bond proceeds intended for the resuscitation of production at the Dana Steel Rolling Factory in Katsina and other unapproved purposes.

Count five alleged that the defendants and others conspired to “fraudulently remove and transfer to one Atlantic Shrimpers Account No: 0001633175 with Access Bank and divert the sum of N60,300,000 (Sixty Million Three Hundred Thousand Naira).”

The money was also said to be part of the bond proceeds from Ecobank meant for the resuscitation of production at the aforementioned factory and other unapproved uses.

The cumulative amount involved in the charge stands at N1,374,300,000.

When the matter was called on Thursday, Okeya told the court that though the case was scheduled for the arraignment of the defendants, Ranesh was not in court.

She then urged the court to issue a bench warrant for Ranesh’s arrest.

However, Bidemi Ademola-Bello, defence lawyer, disagreed with Okeya.

Ademola-Bello said they had filed a preliminary objection challenging the jurisdiction of the court to hear the matter and that the prosecution had already been served.

Okeya, on her part, objected to taking the preliminary objection on the ground that the defendants ought to be arraigned first before the court could entertain any other application.

In his ruling, Egwuatu asked Ademola-Bello to refer the court to any section of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015, that makes provision for his request.

The judge also ordered the parties to address the court in the next adjourned date on whether the preliminary objection ought to be taken before arraignment.

He subsequently adjourned the matter until November 4

In today’s fast-paced business world, staying ahead of the competition often means having access to the right tools, equipment, or vehicles. Yet, acquiring these assets can strain even the healthiest of budgets, forcing companies to either cut back on growth opportunities or dig into reserves.

This is where asset financing comes in, a lifeline for businesses looking to thrive without draining their cash flow. Through asset financing, companies can acquire necessary equipment or machinery without having to pay the full cost upfront. Instead, they spread the payments over time, ensuring they keep their working capital intact for other pressing needs.

Three years ago, Adebayo Logistics, a small transport company based in Lagos, was on the brink of a breakthrough. They had just landed a significant contract with a large e-commerce company to handle nationwide deliveries. But there was one problem, they did not have enough trucks to meet the new demand.

Purchasing the required vehicles outright would have drained their resources, potentially jeopardizing their ability to pay staff and cover operational costs. That is when they turned to asset financing from CitiHoms Finance Company.

With an affordable and flexible payment plan, Adebayo Logistics was able to acquire the fleet they needed without breaking the bank. Over the next few months, their revenue skyrocketed as they fulfilled the contract and expanded their operations. Asset financing not only enabled them to seize this business opportunity but also helped them grow sustainably.

Today, Adebayo Logistics is one of the fastest-growing transport companies in the region, a testament to the power of timely financial solutions.

Why Businesses Need Asset Financing

• Preserves Cash Flow: Asset financing spreads payments over time, allowing businesses to retain their working capital.
• Quick Access to Equipment: No need to wait until you have saved up for major purchases; asset financing gives you access to the equipment you need when you need it.
• Tax Benefits: Many forms of asset financing come with tax deductions on interest payments, which can further reduce the cost.
• Increased Flexibility: From leasing to hire purchase, businesses have multiple options to choose the plan that best fits their financial situation.
• Protects Against Depreciation: Leasing, in particular, helps businesses avoid the risk of depreciation that comes with owning rapidly outdated equipment, especially in tech-heavy industries.

At CitiHoms Finance, we understand that every business journey is unique, which is why we offer tailored asset financing solutions designed to meet your specific needs. Whether you are a small business looking to expand or an established company aiming to upgrade, our flexible financing plans can help you get the equipment you need to stay competitive.

Do not let capital constraints hold your business back. Contact CitiHoms Finance Company today to explore how our asset financing solutions can fuel your business growth. With us by your side, you will have the tools you need to succeed without sacrificing your financial stability.

Get started now by visiting our website or speaking to one of our experts. Let us grow your business together!