Connect with us

General News

CIOs and IT Departments – Cost Center or Profit Centre

Published

on

Bola Adisa
Kindly share this post

In business, an operating unit is either making money or it’s detracting from a company’s profits. In simple terms, it’s the difference between a profit center and a cost center.

IT Departments worldwide face the difficult task of demonstrating the ROI that they provide to their parent companies.

IT Departments provide essential support services to other departments within a company, however; these contributions are often not easily quantified into revenue.

Most IT departments traditionally function as cost centers, a business model in which funds are invested but an obvious return on investment is not easily visible.

There’s an increasing need to transform IT Departments into a revenue contributing business. The impact of IT on business is deep, pervasive, and growing.

We literally can’t separate IT and general business. The better any company exploits technology, the better they are at their jobs, knowing customers, working with partners, capturing markets, growing profits.

IT is being called on to transform business, and to do so IT must transform itself, too.

As the developing markets e.g. Nigeria matures, executives becomes wiser and sees the need to focus more on their core business.

And these we have seen with decreasing IT budgets, or outright outsourcing of all IT function. We can broadly say that enterprise in Africa are at a cross-road and are facing typical business challenges – which are changing the way IT function is organized.

Then Role of CIO is also changing – with the change in the IT requirements and model of IT engagements.  IT is getting more and more aligned to business functions – and is seen as a critical enabler for conducting operations.

Traditionally enterprises in the Africa have taken a CAPEX centric approach, – however they now starting to realize the need for and benefits of – OPEX based models.

What this means is that organizations are looking at means to improve ways in which business is conducted.

This may be true for all functions within an organization like Supply Chain, sales and marketing etc.

In the current context of business transformation, including IT departments, CIOs need to innovate in order to stay relevant. Based on survey amongst CIO in the West Africa region, the top priorities for CIOs and IT Managers are getting executive buy-in and support for strategic/innovative IT projects; obtaining budgets for IT investments and managing growing expectations and service needs. I strongly believe CIOs can take advantage of these challenges to re-invent themselves and be seen differently by the business. CIOs need to more from IT productivity to business productivity.

IDC had in different forum highlight the advent of disruptive technology with the 3rd Platform: Cloud, Mobility, Big Data & Analytics and Social technologies had impacted the way IT is consumed. This in itself provides both opportunity and a threat to CIOs and their IT Departments.

An opportunity, if the CIO takes advantage of these to reinvent his IT department by showing value beyond that been seen as a cost center to becoming a profit center.

And the 3rd platform could be a threat if The CIO does nothing other than “keeping lights on” and just maintaining IT systems. Some CIOs can hardly leverage IT to unlock real value and profit, and as a result, most businesses treat IT as a cost center, because that is what it is to them. CIOs need to take advantage of exploits in technology, knowing the business, knowing the business’ customers, working with partners and to growing profits, thereby maintaining their relevance to the organisation.

Already a new class of strategic IT organization is emerging, one that uses the business of the 3rd Platform in cloud, mobile, mixed-sourcing, strategic souring, and e-commerce as core components by delivering business services even better and cheaper than some IT departments.

How Can CIOs transform their IT Departments from a Cost Center to a Profit Center?
The process of transforming a cost center to a profit center is not a simple one, but it’s very achievable.

The first step in transitioning to a profit center is performing a gap analysis. IT leaders should take stock of what they really need to transit, that is, judge what the current position is and decide on the eventual goal of the department.

IT leaders must be certain to ensure that they identify and assess all barriers to transforming the IT department as well as discover what variety of the profit center model is most suitable to the company. Questions that could be asked during the gap analysis are the following:
•    Is there a market or how can I create a market for the IT department to sell identified services to external companies?
•    Do I have resources or partnerships to evolve the transition? 
•    Do O I have a sellable transition business plan to the business?

Take a stock of your IT investments in Licenses or infrastructure, there is a service you probably can compartmentalize and extend to provide and sell to small businesses?

CIOs and IT Managers may also consider a “Charge Back” model to internal sister departments within the corporate depending on the size and structure of the parent company.

A charge back method would strive to frame and describe the means in which an IT department’s sister departments can compensate IT for “extra” or “additional” or “add-on” services delivered e.g. Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) implementation for enterprise mobility.

Creating a charge back method requires participation from all of IT’s internal business partners. Developing a compensation or charge back has the potential to be politically explosive within a corporate, but the benefit to IT is that it can help dispel the notion that it is a cost center by enabling IT to prove that it can generate obvious revenue or at lease save significant cost by regulating technology consumption.

By charging internal business partners for IT services, IT would be able to clearly show the benefits their services provide. For bigger corporation where departments are responsible for their own IT budgets, IT departments need to determine competitive differentiation in delivering its services. Competitive differentiation in this context means that IT should realize that they are not guaranteed to win all contracts put up for bid by internal departments.

IT departments must ensure that they are competitive with their outside competition and must display this competitive advantage by completing projects in an efficient and timely manner.

It is important to know that transforming IT departments from cost center to profit center is a new paradigm that is essential because of the way technology usage is changing. While it may not be popular now does not mean it’s not worth considering.

One phenomenon that we already see putting threat on the job and relevance of CIOs and IT Departments is Business Process Outsourcing (BPO). It’s gradually permeating the IT space as well. Locally, we’ve seen where a whole IT department is outsourced.

You may argue that that is on bigger scale and only big companies can possibly do that. The truth is that when Cloud Computing is at its best, and regulations permit, small and mid-size companies may decide access ERP, CRM services from the cloud on a subscription basis and move from CAPEX to OPEX model as far IT is concerned.

Ten years ago, CIOUpdate.com columnist Sourabh Hajela states that “IT cannot work as a profit center because it fails to meet the requirements for a department to function as a profit center because of the following reasons:
•    Revenues and costs: Accurately quantifying revenues and costs.
•    Market: A focus on customer relationships that are generating higher profits and either discontinue or deemphasize those that aren’t.
•    Product Mix: The creation of a portfolio of products and services driven by market demand.
•    Product pricing: Price products and services to maximize profits.
•    Timing: It is often said that, in business, timing is everything. Profit centers are profitable when they can quickly respond to a market opportunity.”

Mr. Hajela general surmises that IT departments cannot work as profit centers because of its close alignment with other business departments. “An ITO cannot work as a profit center because it has a captive relationship with its “customers,” 

I am sure this suggestion by Mr. Hajela has been over shadowed by the advent of the disruptive technology in the 3rd Platform and the emergence of new models and options for businesses to consume.

In a short while, there will be an increasing pressure to transform IT Departments into a business, a revenue generating entity. CIOs should be prepared to answer the question, what kind of transformation makes the most sense for my business?

I’ll close this article with a quote from Charles Darwin that “It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.”

Bola Adisa
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 07061547518


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

General News

Woherem Proposes Pragmatic Roadmap to End Terrorism and Banditry in Nigeria

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Dr. Evans Woherem, an award-winning African technology researcher, analyst, and writer, has proposed a comprehensive and implementable strategy to end terrorism, banditry, and criminal violence in Nigeria, warning that the country’s prolonged insecurity has reached a critical point that demands urgent, coordinated action.

Titled “A Comprehensive Strategy for Ending Terrorism, Banditry, and Criminal Violence in Nigeria: A Pragmatic, Multi-Layered, and Implementable Framework,” the paper presents a holistic roadmap designed to reverse more than a decade of escalating violence that has claimed thousands of lives, displaced communities, weakened local economies, and eroded public trust in governance.

According to him, insecurity has become deeply entrenched in everyday life across the country. “Terrorism, banditry, and criminal violence have become so commonplace that they now dominate daily conversations among Nigerians,” Dr. Woherem noted, adding that while the crisis is most acute in the North-East, North-West, and North-Central regions, “its effects are now being felt even in the southern parts of the country.”

Citing the 2025 Global Terrorism Index, which ranks Nigeria sixth globally in terms of terrorism impact, Dr. Woherem described the ranking as “a sobering statistical confirmation that terrorism still weighs heavily on the Nigerian state.”

The paper traces the roots of the crisis to the emergence of Boko Haram in 2009 and the subsequent rise of splinter groups such as ISWAP. It recalls high-profile incidents including the 2014 abduction of schoolgirls in Chibok, the Dapchi and Kankara kidnappings, and a series of mass abductions and attacks on schools and places of worship recorded in 2025.

Dr. Woherem observed that banditry, largely driven by ransom payments, “has spread across the entire nation, creating fear, weakening productivity, and pushing millions of households deeper into poverty.”

While acknowledging the role of military action, the author cautioned against relying on force alone. “Nigeria cannot defeat insurgency and violent crime through arms and ammunition alone,” he said. “Any sustainable solution must confront the internal conditions that allow insecurity to thrive.”

Among the key drivers identified in the paper by Dr. Woherem, are porous borders, arms proliferation, youth unemployment, economic stagnation, and persistent conflicts over land and resources, challenges Dr. Woherem stressed can be addressed through “a deliberate, intelligence-led, and whole-of-society approach.”

At the heart of the proposed framework, Woherem noted, is a call for intelligence-driven security operations, including the establishment of a National Counter-Insurgency and Intelligence Fusion Centre. “Security operations must be guided by accurate, actionable intelligence rather than fear-led mass actions that often harm civilians and undermine public trust,” he stated.

The paper also advocates comprehensive policing reforms, including the creation of constitutionally backed state police systems supported by a more specialized federal police structure. “Nigeria’s over-centralised policing model is structurally incapable of effectively addressing widespread criminality across such a vast and diverse country.”

Recognising the realities at the grassroots, Woherem calls for the formal regulation of community-based security groups, and noted that “ignoring vigilante groups is dangerous, and banning them outright is unrealistic,” but stressed that their roles must be clearly defined, regulated, and subject to strict oversight.

On border security, particularly in the Lake Chad Basin, the author warned that instability in neighbouring countries continues to fuel Nigeria’s insecurity. “No permanent solution is possible without deep regional cooperation,” he said, advocating an Integrated Border Management system supported by joint operations with neighbouring states.

The paper places strong emphasis on prevention through economic inclusion, youth employment, and skills development. “Jobs and income remain the most powerful tools for preventing recruitment into violent groups,” Dr. Woherem asserted, adding that immediate livelihood opportunities significantly weaken the appeal of extremist narratives.

He also called for structured deradicalisation and reintegration programmes, noting that “a humane, community-accepted process is essential for breaking cycles of violence and preventing relapse into extremism.”

Dr. Woherem further emphasised the need for governance reforms and accountability in the security sector. “Without transparency, oversight, and institutional integrity, even the best security strategies will fail,” he warned.

The white paper outlines a phased implementation plan from 2025 to 2030, beginning with intelligence fusion, pilot state police initiatives, community security registration, drone surveillance, and financial crackdowns on terror networks, before expanding into nationwide reforms and long-term consolidation.

Concluding, Dr. Woherem expressed cautious optimism about Nigeria’s future. “Nigeria can overcome this prolonged phase of insecurity,” he said, “but only through political will, coordinated institutions, and the active participation of society.”

He added that the proposed framework offers “a realistic pathway to restoring security, rebuilding public trust, and unlocking Nigeria’s vast human and economic potential.”


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

REDAN Seals Landmark MoU, Validates Sytemap’s Real Estate Infrastructure

Published

on

Kindly share this post

In a market where less than 3% of land is formally registered and property fraud remains systemic, infrastructure, not apps, is becoming the defining battleground for real estate innovation.

REDAN Seals Landmark MoU, Validates Sytemap’s Real Estate Infrastructure

L-R: Ndifreke Ikokpu, COO, Sytemap, HRM Oba Akintoye Adeoye, President REDAN & Cholatte Odunlade-Akeji, Director, RightHome

That reality came into sharp focus on December 18, 2025, as the Real Estate Developers Association of Nigeria (REDAN) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Sytemap Technologies Limited, signaling a major industry endorsement of Sytemap’s land and real estate transaction infrastructure.

The partnership centers on RightHOME, a jointly developed digital real estate platform powered by Sytemap’s secure cloud infrastructure, mapping systems, transaction monitoring, and fraud-prevention architecture, with REDAN driving ecosystem adoption through its nationwide developer network.

Nigeria’s real estate sector processes transactions worth trillions of naira annually, yet remains heavily manual, fragmented, and vulnerable to disputes. Industry data suggests unresolved title issues alone lock up ₦36 trillion in dead capital, limiting access to finance and slowing development.

“This MoU represents a shift from fragmented digitization to coordinated infrastructure,” said Nnamdi Uba, CEO at Sytemap. “When the industry body itself aligns around shared standards, verification, and technology, innovation can finally scale responsibly.”

Under the agreement:

·       REDAN will onboard registered developers and promote adoption of the platform as a trusted digital channel.

·       Sytemap will deliver secure hosting, real-time monitoring, escrow-aligned transaction workflows, and compliance with Nigeria’s data protection regulations.

·       Joint standards will be developed for digital verification, transparency, and asset mapping.

From a technology perspective, the partnership reflects a growing consensus that solving African real estate challenges requires deep infrastructure, not surface-level marketplaces. Fraud detection, uptime reliability, auditability, and regulatory alignment, areas often overlooked in proptech, are central to Sytemap’s approach.

HRM Oba Akintoye Adeoye, representing REDAN noted, “This collaboration allows developers to operate in a system where trust is embedded, not assumed. That is critical for long-term growth.”

For the broader tech ecosystem, the MoU stands out as a rare example of industry-led validation, where a national association formally aligns with a technology provider to modernize an entire sector.

Ndifreke Ikokpu, COO at Sytemap signed on behalf of Sytemap while Cholatte Odunlade – Akeji, CEO of RightHome signed on behalf of the Special Purpose Vehicle.

As pressure mounts to unlock housing finance, attract institutional capital, and reduce transaction risk, the REDAN–Sytemap partnership positions digital land infrastructure not as an optional upgrade, but as a foundational requirement for the future of real estate in Nigeria.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

Oyedele Warns Delay in Tax Reforms Will Keep 98% of Workers Overtaxed

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Taiwo Oyedele, Chairman of the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee, has cautioned that failure to implement Nigeria’s new tax laws by January 1, 2026, would leave the vast majority of workers and businesses at a disadvantage.

Oyedele Warns Delay in Tax Reforms Will Keep 98% of Workers Overtaxed

Taiwo Oyedele

Speaking on Channels Television’s The Morning Brief, Oyedele said postponing the reforms would mean that “the bottom 98 per cent of workers remain overtaxed,” while businesses continue to grapple with multiple taxation and miss out on exemptions.

He added that small and unprofitable enterprises would still be subject to minimum taxes, and hidden VAT charges would keep driving up the cost of essentials such as food, healthcare, and education.

His comments come amid calls by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate Peter Obi, and several civil society groups for a suspension of the reforms. Oyedele argued that rather than halting implementation, specific areas of concern should be identified and corrected.

“So, we need to be clear about what we are asking for,” he said. “Even if it is established that there have been substantial alterations to what the National Assembly passed, my view will be to identify those provisions… and go ahead to implement the law as passed by the NASS, while you address the issues as to how they got in there in the first place.”

Oyedele acknowledged that even the version passed by lawmakers contained sections requiring amendment, citing issues with referencing and definitions.

He also addressed controversy over alleged discrepancies between the gazetted laws and those approved by the National Assembly, noting that without access to the officially harmonised bills certified by the clerk, it was difficult to determine differences.

He pointed to Section 41(8), which initially appeared to require a 20 per cent deposit but was later excluded from the final version, stressing that some draft materials circulating in the media did not originate from the House committee. “I think we should allow them do the investigation,” he said.

President Bola Tinubu has already signed the four tax reform bills into law, describing them as the most significant overhaul of Nigeria’s tax system in decades.

The reforms — the Nigeria Tax Act, Nigeria Tax Administration Act, Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Act, and Joint Revenue Board (Establishment) Act — are scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2026, under a unified Nigeria Revenue Service.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending