Telecom
DPOs Advocate Single Regulatory Body for Data Protection Acts

Some Data Protection Officers (DPOs) have advocated a single regulatory body for Data Protection Acts, to sustain the already established confidence by investors in the country.

Participant and facilitators at a three- day workshop organised by Data and Knowledge Information Academy for Data Protection Officers in Lagos
The DPOs spoke in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Lagos on Thursday, on the sidelines of the 2nd edition of a training workshop for DPOs.
They spoke against the backdrop of Lagos state proposing a Data Protection Bill.
NAN reports that the three-day workshop, which is from Oct. 15 to Oct. 17, is organised by the Data and Knowledge Information Academy (DKIA), a subsidiary of Data & Knowledge Information Privacy Protection Initiative (DKIPPI).
NAN also report that the workshop is to prepare non-certified Data Protection Officers (DPO) for Nigeria Data Protection Certification Examination by Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC).
Highlighting the benefits, the President of DKIPPI, Mr Tokunbo Smith, said that a single regulatory body, which is the NDPC for data protection acts rather than separate regulatory bodies, would streamline processes, reduce confusion and make it easier for businesses to operate.
Smith said that this would also help to protect data subject rights and maintain the principle of data protection.
He said that having a single regulator would also help to avoid legal issues and confusion around who collects what and when.
According to him, this approach will be similar to how the European Commission maintains one law regulating all European countries, and how China and South Africa have one regulator.
“This would help to create a more business friendly environment and attract investors, as they would only have to deal with one regulator.
“Also, when you look at it from the organisational aspect, most organisations are struggling, the economy is not good.
“This means we are creating a hostile environment for investors, because when investors come in, they are going to talk about their personal data and data subject as well,” he said.
According to Smith, if Europe cannot guarantee the personal data of a data subject from abroad, the country will lose investors.
Smith, also a Data Controller, said: “The best thing is for the one single regulator.
“They can have branches, regional branches, or state branches, that will now control the difference the states”.
Also, the Head, Research and Strategy, Nigeria Council of Real Estate Insurance Workers, Mrs Fadheelah Salam, affirmed that there should be a single regulatory body for data protection law.
Salam said that having different or states regulatory body would jeopardise the purpose of the one 18 months data protection law.
She said that not only would it erode inter and intra trade, but also promote underdevelopment of some state because some would eventually not implement the law.
According to her, NCDC is supposed to be the overall body that monitors all the states’ compliance to the NCDC Act, it can only have branch offices in each state for them to monitor implementation, advocacy and awareness.
Another participant of the training from Industrial General Insurance, Mr Sheriff Adeyeye, also advocated a single regulatory body for the NDPC acts, just as it is inheritance banking and insurance sector.
Adeyeye said that NDPC should be like the Central Bank of Nigeria, NDIC, that have branches in every state but have only one regulator because it is easier to monitor people’s activities that way.
“Take for instance, someone from Central Bank in another state could come to Lagos state to audit the banks because it is heading towards one direction, one goal which is easier.
“In this case, if there should be different regulators in each state, apparently there will be diversion from the main goal of the regulator and be uses as internally generated revenue by different states”.
Another participant from the Institute of Directors, Chucks Ezinmadu, said that there should be one regulator, simply because it is easier to manage and implement.
According to Ezinmadu, there is a reason the European Commission has one law regulating all the European countries, 26 countries countries coming together to adopt the General Data Protection Regulation.
He said same thing could be replicated in Nigeria to avoid some legal tussles within the state and Federal, as to who collects what and when.
Telecom
Gaps on Phone Number Recycling Fuel Identity Theft, Data Breaches- ICIR

When Okezie Kelechi lost his SIM card, the one he had used since his secondary school days, he didn’t think much of it.
He was shocked weeks later to find out it had been reassigned to someone else.
“I had no idea that if your SIM card has been inactive for more than three months, they will resell it,” he wrote on social media.
“They recycled my SIM card and sold it. Same number, I have had it since secondary school.”
Kelechi’s story is far from unique.
Across Nigeria, more people are waking up to the realities of what is known as SIM recycling, a process where telecommunication companies reassign inactive phone numbers to new users. While allowed under existing rules set by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), the practice is now raising serious concerns over data privacy, fraud, and national security.
A regulatory gap with real-life consequences
Experts in Nigeria’s telecommunications and security sectors are increasingly warning that the NCC’s failure to establish stronger oversight of SIM recycling is endangering millions.
“Beyond the data breaches, this issue posed a big threat to national security. I have always maintained the need for a central data system in Nigeria,” said Daniel Makolo, a retired senior official of the Nigerian Immigration Service to The ICIR.
“There’s much more to this if we don’t pay attention to an appropriate central data mining system that gives us a history of each person in the country.”
Ayodele Ajayi, an engineering professor at the Federal University of Technology, Akure, explained the security risks from his own experience.
“I used to have one Airtel number, but I travelled out. Before I came back, it was reallocated to another user,” he said.
Because phone numbers are tied to Bank Verification Numbers (BVNs) and National Identity Numbers (NINs), reassigning them can expose people to identity theft and financial loss.
The NCC should find a way to notify users when their numbers are at risk of being deactivated, Ajayi urged.
He also recounted an incident he witnessed at a bank, “a woman was narrating how she used to have a particular number but lost it. Somebody saw the number and started using it.
The woman said that before she could act, the person who got the number had started using it and had connived with a bank office to almost wipe out all her savings.
“Upon arriving at the bank to check her account balance, she found out that she had only N50,000 left from about N5 million she had saved up.”
Ajayi emphasised that while recycling is a practical move for telcos to manage limited number availability, more caution is needed.
“Let people know so they can migrate their data to another line, particularly now that almost every channel we use is linked to the phone number, including our bank verification number (BVN)”, he stated.
Kelechi recalled that his number was reassigned to another user despite still being active on WhatsApp.
“I used to wonder why random Hausa boys were always messaging me and calling me baby.
He added that “when I finally visited MTN office in Nigeria, I was told the line has been sold to someone else. E pain me, I no go lie.”
Another social media user Elizabeth Kandi, @DrETKandi warning others about the hidden risks of SIM inactivity alleges that when reassigned the new user can have access to your USSD banking.
“If your Nigerian number was connected to your Nigerian bank accounts for USSD, if you didn’t use it for long, the network provider can disconnect and sell the number to someone else…but that person would be able to access your money via USSD,” Kandi wrote.
Her post underscores the growing fear that recycled numbers, still linked to sensitive services like mobile banking, can open the door to fraud and financial loss
Why do Telcos recycle SIMs?
At a virtual stakeholder meeting in April 2025, NCC Executive Vice Chairman Aminu Maida acknowledged the concern noting that with the evolving landscape, it has become necessary to address emerging challenges that could undermine consumer rights.
He further noted that the Quality-of-Service Business Rules 2024 stipulate that a prepaid line without a revenue-generating event for six months must be deactivated.
This means if a prepaid SIM card goes unused for six months (i.e., no calls, texts, or data use), it must be deactivated.
If the inactivity continues for another six months, the number may be recycled/reallocated to a new user.
In Section 28 of the NCC’s draft business it is stated that all recycled SIMs must be purged of any NIN attached to allow a new user to link their own NIN. But real-world cases suggest that in practice, many recycled numbers are not properly sanitised before reassignment.
The business case for SIM recycling
For telecom operators, recycling isn’t just a technical choice, it’s economic.
Gbenga Adebayo, chairman, Association of Licensed Telecoms Operators of Nigeria (ALTON), explained that subscribers do not have ownership rights to SIM cards in their possession, as the telecom operators pay procurement and recurring costs for each registered subscriber.
He further explained that SIM cards are “recycled” to prevent number exhaustion while reducing the cost of generating and maintaining them.
“SIM cards are reassigned to reduce the dormant subscribers, as telcos are profit-oriented organisations,” Adebayo said.
In the exercise of its powers under Section 70 of the NCC Act (2003), the commission made provisions for the development of a new numbering plan for Nigeria. Under the provision, telcos are obligated to pay a sum that is the ‘numbering plan fees’ to maintain their allocated numbers.
Telecom
Airtel Recommits to Fraud Prevention after NCC’s N104m Fine for SIM Registration Breaches

Airtel Nigeria has restated its commitment to transparency, customer safety, and regulatory collaboration following recent regulatory enforcement by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC).
The NCC had served Airtel Nigeria a notice of sanction over some alleged SIM infractions in Kano State and consequently slammed a fine of N104 million on the telecommunications firm.
NCC had in a letter, addressed to Airtel Nigeria Chief Executive Officer, dated May 26, 2025, signed by Chizua Whyte, head, Legal and Regulatory Services, and Mohammed Dari, acting head, Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement, on behalf of Dr Aminu Maida, executive vice chairman, NCC, titled: ‘Notice of Sanction: Non-Compliance with SIM Registration Directive in Kano,’ where the infractions were spelt out.
According to NCC, Airtel infractions include unauthorised SIM registrations using 198 unapproved devices, resulting in 8,275 registrations outside the 281 verified Airtel shops; premature activation of 63 MSISDNs prior to proper SIM registration, contrary to the provisions of the Registration of Communications Subscribers Regulations 2022; failure to conduct effective eyeballing, leading to 407 fraudulent SIM registrations with multiple NINs, contrary to the provision of the Registration of Communications Subscribers Regulations 2022 and failure to provide satisfactory explanation for SIM registrations conducted between 12.00 a.m and 6.00 a.m.
On the matter, the letter revealed that there were some letter exchanges and subsequent meetings on the infractions between the telecom regulator and Airtel, starting from January 12, 2025, March 19, 2025, March 24, 2025, and March 27, 2025, respectively.
Apparently, after investigations and responses from Airtel, the NCC was not satisfied and this led to the fine of N104 million, which was to be paid within seven days from the date the letter was issued.
Specifically, NCC fined Airtel N5 million, N12 million, N81.4 million and N5 million for the infractions respectively.
Reacting, Airtel, expressed appreciation to the NCC for uncovering the infractions, describing the development as a critical opportunity to strengthen internal processes and further align with national security and regulatory expectations
“We thank the NCC for its vigilance and continued support in protecting the integrity of the telecoms ecosystem. Airtel takes these findings seriously and is already implementing corrective measures,” a spokesperson for the company said.
Only recently, Airtel Nigeria’s CEO recently announced that the company is doubling its investment in the country, focusing on network expansion, fiber-to-the-street rollout, 4G/5G deployment, customer care upgrades, and digital infrastructure security.
These investments reinforce Airtel’s long-term vision of building a resilient and forward-looking telecom network that meets the evolving needs of Nigerians.
“Our systems are constantly evolving to stay ahead of scammers and malicious actors,” the spokesperson added. “This is not just about compliance; it’s about our responsibility to the millions of Nigerians who rely on Airtel daily.”
Airtel Nigeria says it will continue to work closely with the NCC and other arms of government to ensure high standards of service and safety for all telecom users nationwide.
Telecom
Kenya Beats Nigeria As the Most Progressive ICT Regulation in Africa

Kenya is celebrating its regulatory ecosystem being ranked as the most progressive in Africa. The International Telecommunications Union (ITU) has ranked the East African country first in its most recent ICT Regulatory Tracker.
ITU’s ICT Regulatory Tracker is an evidence-gathering tool for decision-makers and regulators. It demonstrates the effectiveness of regulatory systems in the age of technology.
The ITU evaluates the design of the national regulatory authority, the scope of the regulatory mandate, the obtaining regulatory environment, and the robustness of the competition framework in member countries.
Kenya received 93 points, up from 92 in 2023, and now leads the continent in best practices for ICT regulations.
Nigeria and South Africa finished second and third, with 92 and 88 points respectively. Malawi, Egypt, Rwanda, Morocco, Uganda, Burkina Faso, and Senegal complete the top 10 list.
Globally, Kenya was ranked 20th out of 194 countries covered.Italy led the rankings, with 100 points.
The regulator, Communications Authority (CA) of Kenya, said the achievement underscored Kenya’s commitment to creating a robust, technology-neutral regulatory environment that supports innovation, affordability and access.
Steve Isaboke, permanent secretary for broadcasting and telecommunications, visited CA Centre in Nairobi following the announcement on Thursday.
“The ranking is a clear testament of the excellent work that CA has done in spearheading Kenya’s digital transformation and driving digital access for all,” he said.
“After 25 years, CA’s regulatory regime has attained maturity, and gained global recognition. This ranking shows that the CA staff and leadership are executing their work diligently.”
- Telecom3 days ago
Airtel Recommits to Fraud Prevention after NCC’s N104m Fine for SIM Registration Breaches
- Telecom3 days ago
MTN’s Female Leadership Surges to 41.4%, Doubles Industry Average
- News3 days ago
IHS Nigeria Reaffirms Commitment to raising Nigeria’s Next Tech Giants from the Ilorin Innovation Hub
- Broadcasting3 days ago
NCC Warns DJs: Playing Music Without License Could Lead to 5-Year Jail Term
- E-Financial3 days ago
Gambaryan, Binance Executive Leaves Company after 8-Month Detention in Nigeria
- Telecom3 days ago
TikTok Rolls Out Personalization Tools for Nigerian Users
- General News3 days ago
NITDA Makes Case for Inclusive Tech for Special Needs
- General News3 days ago
Interswitch, Bank of Sierra Leone Champion Financial Inclusion @ Sierra Leone Fintech Forum 2.0