Connect with us

E-Financial

Ecobank Nigeria to Appeal Honeywell’s Purported N72 billion Court Judgement

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Ecobank Nigeria Limited says it will appeal a judgement by the Federal High Court in Lagos, presided over by Hon. Justice Liman, which delivered a judgment in favour of Honeywell Flour against the bank and ordered it to pay the sum of N72 billion.

The bank said it believe that the judgment is perverse and cannot stand the test of time. It also noted that it would vigorously challenge same, and remain confident that it can reverse this judgment at the higher courts.

Sources from the bank stated that the instant suit was an action filed in 2018 for the enforcement of the Bank’s Undertaking as to Damages which was filed in pursuance of its Winding Up Petition and the Ex-Parte Orders which were granted in favour of the Bank.

“We challenged the action through a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 16th October, 2018 whereby we challenged the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court, as (among other reasons), the action did not fall within the provisions of Section 251 (d) of the Constitution, being that the subject matter of the suit was for the Claim of Damages arising out of an Ex-Parte Order, as opposed to a Banker-Customer relationship.

Trial was concluded in this matter since 9th March, 2021 and the parties adopted their final written addresses alongside our Notice of Preliminary objection on the 16th March, 2022, the Court then adjourned the matter to 27th May, 2022 for judgment. While the court failed to deliver judgment on the said date, the registrar of the court promised to inform counsel whenever the judgement was ready”.

“In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in the Bank’s favour, in Suit No. SC/CV/210/2021 which was delivered on 27th January 2023, the bank further filed a Motion on notice dated 9th March, 2023 to dismiss the Suit on the grounds that same has become academic as a result of the judgment entered in favour of Ecobank wherein the Supreme Court held that Honeywell remained indebted to the Bank.

“The Court heard motion dated 9th March, 2023 and adjourned to 23th June, 2023 for ruling on our two applications and also for delivery of judgment.

“The Court consequently delivered the said ruling/judgment today July 18 via a virtual proceeding at about 4pm.

“In its Judgment, the Court dismissed the two applications we filed, holding that it has jurisdiction to entertain the suit and also that the suit had not become academic”.

According to the bank, In reaching its judgment, the Court ignored/refused (among others): Submissions showing that the Ex-Parte Orders were discharged on points of law and not that it was frivolously obtained by the Bank; that the Ex-Parte Order lasted for less than 2 weeks, contrary to the Claim of Honeywell which was said to have covered the period of three years; that the documents presented by Honeywell particularly the annual returns did not show the alleged damage, hence same was indeed non-existent; that documents from various other Banks who were served with the ex-parte order showed that the Honeywell companies were indeed highly indebted to them, hence there was no way the Ex-Parte Orders would have frozen funds in the said Banks; and more importantly, the Court refused all the objections regarding the documents maliciously prepared by Honeywell for the sole purpose of instituting the Suit and claiming unjustifiable sums from the Bank.

The bank reiterated that it is a member of the Ecobank Group, the Pan-African Bank which is proudly and fully committed to transparency in all the countries where it operates, and abide by laws and regulations. It believes that this matter should be conclusively determined in line with the applicable judicial process.


Kindly share this post

Ugo Onwuaso is an ICT enthusiast. He believes technology should be used for general good. He holds a Master of Public Administration (MPA) degree from the Lagos state University. Dear Reader, Your support matters. But we believe that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. That is why, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and finance and how they affect lives. Our incisive and analytical view of how technology news affects the daily life help individuals and organizations make up their minds. Quality journalism costs money. Today, we're asking that you support us to do more. Kindly support our effort to deliver technology and finance journalism to everyone in the world. Donate as little as N1,000. Bank transfers can be made to: UBA Plc 1017156876 Communication Week Media Ltd

E-Financial

SEC Says 50 Crypto Exchanges have Applied for Licenses

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Dr. Emonotimi Agama, director-general, Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), has disclosed that 50 cryptocurrency exchanges have applied for operational licences in the country.

SEC Says 50 Crypto Exchanges have Applied for Licenses

Agama who spoke during a fireside chat at the BusinessDay Blockchain Conference in Lagos recently, said the commission received “50 applications and has accepted seven firms into its programmes”.

“Our work at the SEC is to protect investors and foster market development,” he said.

“The commission is open to innovation. Businesses must meet regulatory and compliance requirements to ensure the growth of a stable and sustainable digital economy.”

According to him, the government is receptive to crypto and blockchain because it has seen the country’s youths adopt the technology.

Agama added that the pace of acceptance of digital assets may vary across different sectors but will eventually happen.

“For innovators, we encourage you to seize the opportunity to develop blockchain solutions tailored to Africa’s unique needs,” he said.

“Focus on solving real-world problems, such as financial exclusion, inefficient supply chains, and lack of transparency in governance.”

Recall that SEC had on August 29, granted Busha Digital Limited and Quidax Technologies Limited “approval-in-principle” to commence operation under the accelerated regulatory incubation programme (ARIP).

The ARIP was introduced by the SEC to onboard firms that had already begun operations before the release of the rules on virtual asset service providers in May 2022

The commission equally introduced the regulatory incubation programme (RIP) designed to evaluate the business models of digital asset firms and allow them to test their products, services, and technology in a real-world market environment under the regulator’s close supervision.

The commission also said additional licence applications were being assessed and that approvals-in-principle would be granted on a case-by-case basis once the requirements were met.

However, on September 4, SEC clarified that it has not yet fully licenced any cryptocurrency exchange.

On his part, Buchi Okoro, chief executive officer (CEO) of Quidax, said regulation helps check operators’ activity in the space and protect investors.

 

 

 

 

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

Reps Panel Asks GTBank to Remit VAT on Remita Transactions to FG

Published

on

Kindly share this post

The House of Representatives Public Accounts Committee, has asked Guaranty Trust Bank (GTB) to calculate and remit the Value Added Tax (VAT) on the commission from Remita between 2015 and 2022 to the federal government recovery accounts.

Reps Panel Asks GTBank to Remit VAT on Remita Transactions to FG

Remita is a financial solution gateway technology used by the federal government for collection of revenue for Ministries, Departments and Agencies to the Treasury Single Account (TSA).

The committee chaired by Hon. Bamidele Salam gave the directive on Thursday at the ongoing investigation into alleged revenue leakages through REMITA platform and non-compliance substantively with standard operating procedure and other allied service agreements.

The panel raised two issues on evidence of remittance of VAT components of Remita collections and collection of fees in the first regime of the Remita transaction.

But, Ahmed Liman, executive director of GTBank, said the bank did not remit the VAT for the period of eight years.

He said: “We believe that Remita is saddled with the responsibility of sharing the commission fees between the payment receiving parties.

“In our mind, we think Remita has done the needful before sharing the fees between the parties.”

Liman also said the collection of fees in the first regime of the Remita transaction, the bank charged 0.75 per cent on all the payers who used the platform.

The executive director added that the bank received N254.4 million from the Accountant General through Remita in 2018.

The committee resolved that the bank should calculate and remit the VAT on the commission fees received from the platform from 2015 to 2022 to the federal government recovery accounts domiciled with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).

Other Banks that appeared before the committee on the same issues were Keystone, Sterling Bank, Polaris Bank, FCMB, Ecobank, Wema among others.

The committee referred the aforementioned banks to the reconciliation sub-committee in order to address the discrepancies that were noted and get a new date to re-appear before the panel.

 

 

 

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

CBN Orders PoS Operators to Route all Transactions through NIBSS or UPSL

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has announced new regulations for processing Point of Sale (PoS) transactions across the country, directing that all POS transaction are to be routed wither through the Nigeria Interbank Settlement System (NIBSS) or Unified Payment Services Limited (UPSL) hence,  breaking the monopoly of the former on transaction processing.

CBN Orders PoS Operators to Route all Transactions through NIBSS or UPSL

In a circular dated September 11, 2024 to all payment service providers on connectivity to Payment Terminal Service Aggregators (PTSA), the CBN directed that payment service providers are to commence regularisation with the PTSAs and notify the CBN in writing to confirm compliance, within 30 days from the date of the circular.

In order to achieve the objective of tracking electronic transactions in Nigeria, the CBN had in August 2011, granted a PTSA licence to Nigeria Interbank Settlement System Plc (NIBSS).

Following concerns over channelling all Point of Sale (PoS) transactions through a single aggregator, it had on April 19, 2024, granted a second PTSA licence to Unified Payment Services Limited (UPSL).

Nearly five months after it granted the licence to UPSL, the CBN has directed that acquirers are “to route all transactions from PoS terminals at merchant and agent locations, whether on physical or electronic PoS terminals, through any CBN-licensed Payment Terminal Service Aggregator (PTSA).”

The circular further read, “PTSAs are required to send PoS transactions to only Processors certified by the relevant Payment Scheme, nominated by the Acquirer and licensed by CBN. All licensed Processors must be integrated with both PTSAs, thereby allowing Acquirers the flexibility to choose which Processor(s) and PTSA to utilise.

“All Payment Terminal Service Providers (PTSPs) must ensure that their PoS devices and applications are configured to route transactions through any PTSA, as directed by the Acquirer.

All PTSPs shall submit monthly returns to the CBN, detailing the number of merchants and agents they manage, along with the PTSA services used to route the corresponding transactions.

“Each PTSA is required to submit monthly returns to the CBN, detailing all transactions processed through their platforms. The returns mentioned above are expected to be submitted to the Director, Payments System Management Department, no later than seven days after the end of each month.”

 

 

 

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending