Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Connect with us

E-Business

Firm Asks Court to Freeze SAP Accounts over Alleged Contract Breach

Published

on

Kindly share this post

B4G Consulting Ltd has asked a Lagos State High Court to restrain Systems Applications Products (SAP) from dissipating $3,371,945.27 and N5mllion with 28 Respondents including the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and 21 other banks, pending determination of an alleged contract breach suit.

Firm Asks Court to Freeze SAP Accounts over Alleged Contract Breach

It is also seeking a Mareva injunction restraining the 1st-28th Respondents from releasing to SAP $3,371,945.27 and N5mllion held with the 1st – 28th Respondents.

It is further seeking to restrain the 1st-28th Respondents from releasing to SAP any funds or other instruments belonging to SAP and held with the 1st – 28th Respondents up to the value of $3,371,945.27 and N5mllion.

It is also praying for an order directing the 1st-28th Respondents to file and serve affidavits before the court within seven days of the grant of the three prayers above, disclosing all funds belonging and/or due and payable to the Defendants/Respondents and held with them, as at the date of service of this motion on each of the Respondents.

The suit, which was formerly before Justice Olukayode Ogunjobi, has now been reassigned to Justice Ezekiel Ashade and proceedings are to resume on March 26, 2021.

B4G Consulting Ltd & Anor, represented by David Ogebe, its counsel, are the Claimants/Applicants in the suit marked LD/ADR/519/2016, while Systems Applications Products Nig. Ltd and Systems Applications Products (Africa Region) (Proprietary) Ltd are the Defendants/Respondents and are represented by Adedapo Tunde-Olowu SAN.

28 others are nominal respondents are National Petroleum Investment Management Services, Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Nigerian Petroleum Development Company Ltd, Department Of Petroleum Resources (DPR), CBN, Debt Management Office (DMO).

The banks are: Access Bank, Ecobank, Citibank, Fidelity Bank Plc, First Bank, First City Monument Bank, Globus Bank, Guaranty Trust Bank, Heritage Bank, Keystone Bank, Polaris Bank, Providus Bank, StanbicIBTC Bank, Standard Chartered Bank, Sterling Bank, Sun Trust Bank, Titan Trust Bank, Union Bank, United Bank For Africa, Unity Bank, Wema Bank Plc and Zenith Bank.

Apart from the Mareva Injunction, the claimant is also seeking other reliefs in the main suit. These include:

“An order directing the Defendants to pay to the Claimants the sum of $83,169.78 being outstanding and unpaid sums, $117. 60 in respect of hoteling for 8 Consultants from January – September 2010 and $267, 792 being pay for services of consultants between July to September 2010

“An order directing the Defendants to provide full details and render accounts including all reviews and payments received from the NNPC in relation to the ERP System contract between SAP and NNPC

“An order directing the Defendants to pay the full 10 per centum face value of the ERP System contract as valued at its date of completion. less previous payments to the Claimants.

B4G Consulting averred in its July 27, 2020, amended statement of claim that sometime in 2009 the defendants engaged it to help broker, procure negotiate, secure and implement an ERP System contract (the SAP ERP contract with the NNPC.

The consideration provided in respect of the engagement was the supply or provision of services to a minimum of 10 per cent of the face value of any secured contract.

Pursuant to the claimants’ engagement, a contract with an initial value of $36.75m (subsequently revalued to $42m) was negotiated and secured between the NNPC and SAP.

The claimant commenced the supply or provision of services in line with the terms of its engagement by SAP, but before it could provide the minimum 10 per cent of the ERP contract, the Claimant’s provision of services was halted – by SAP vide letter dated 12 July 2010.

It averred that SAP without any investigation and without hearing from the Claimants issued a letter of 12 July 2010 unilaterally imposing fresh contractual terms on the parties including demanding exclusion of the physical presence of the 2nd Claimant from the project.

Despite the Claimant’s letters in response of 20 July and 12 August 2010 respectively, SAP ignored these letters.

“The Defendants did not issue payment advice to the Claimants but only made sporadic lump-sum payments to the Claimants account on 21 and 26 July, and 16 August 2010.

But opposing the claimant’s prayer in its February 22, 2021, amended statement of defence, the defendants described the claimant’s case as frivolous, an abuse of court processes that should be struck out with substantial costs against the claimants.

They averred that the claimant was “not entitled to the $83,698.78, $117,66, $3,371.945.27 claimed in this action or any other judgments. The Defendant states that it has no contractual obligation to make any disclosures to the Claimant with respect to the said contract as alleged.”

It added further: “The Defendant also states that they never agreed that the condition to be provided in part of the ERP contract with NNPC ‘is a minimum 10 per cent of the face value of any contract’ as alleged by the Claimants.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

E-Business

African Startups Raised $345m in Funding in May

Published

on

Kindly share this post

African startups raised more than $345 million across 65 deals in May, more than double the amount raised in the same period of last year, according to a report by Briter, a research and business intelligence firm.

The report disclosed that both the number of deals and participating companies declined, confirming a growing trend of fewer companies raising funds in larger sizes.

It said fintech attracted the highest share of funding in May, accounting for 34 percent of the total, while cleantech followed closely, driven by a debt deal from Sun King. The company raised $80 million (in local currency) to expand clean energy access in Nigeria.

“Equity remains the primary instrument in terms of total value. There’s no doubt about it; in fact, equity deals with disclosed amounts captured more than half of the total funding volume in May.

“However, debt financing is increasingly proving its weight. Although it accounted for only 8 percent of all deals, it represented 32 percent of the total funding, highlighting the typically larger size of debt transactions. With the rise of specialised vehicles targeting early-stage businesses, debt is becoming an increasingly important part of Africa’s innovation funding landscape,” it said.

Briter’s report added that grants continued to play a vital role in early-stage support, especially in the education technology (EdTech) sector. The Mastercard Foundation led the pack in grant activity, funding a new cohort of EdTech innovators in Nigeria and Kenya. Each selected startup is set to receive $100,000 in grant funding, in addition to mentorship and business development support.

Multilaterals also made a strong showing in May, it said. The Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), a World Bank Group member, issued a $179.6 million guarantee to CleanTech firm KOKO Networks. The support will help scale its clean energy solutions across Kenya.

“This deal not only demonstrates growing international confidence in African climate ventures but also signals a promising pathway for other asset-intensive startups in clean cooking, agriculture, and renewable energy,” the report said.

From a geographic perspective, Egypt emerged as the continent’s fundraising powerhouse for the month, contributing 51 percent of all funding raised. The country recorded 12 deals across equity, debt, and bond instruments. Notably, FinTech platform MNT-Halan raised $50 million through a bond issuance, further illustrating the diversification of capital-raising mechanisms in the region.

Outside Egypt, funding was distributed across Africa’s three other key markets, which are Egypt, Nigeria, and Kenya, with limited activity recorded in countries such as Ghana, Tunisia, Morocco, and Uganda, each registering between one and three deals.

In terms of exits, the African tech landscape continues to mature. Three companies—Baobab+, Qardy, and Shopa—were acquired in May, bringing the total number of exits this year to 22. This already surpasses last year’s count for the same period. Qardy was acquired by Catalyst Partners Middle East (CPME) in a disclosed deal valued at $23 million, the report added.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Business

Human Hacking: When Cyber Criminals Target You

Published

on

Kindly share this post

By Nancy Werteen

When you get anti-hacking advice, you’ve probably heard “Don’t use a simple password,” or “Don’t plug in that USB you found on the ground.”

Human Hacking: When Cyber Criminals Target You

But there’s one form of hacking that doesn’t always require a computer, and it costs businesses about 4.88 million dollars a year.

Modern hackers aren’t trying to get into your computer; they’re trying to get into you.

“They’ll try to learn about you a little bit, and they’ll try to use that information against you to try to get you to complete some action, maybe to send somebody some money,” said Kevin Moran, PhD, Assistant Professor of Computer Science, Cyber Security and Privacy Cluster, University of Central Florida.

IBM calls this human hacking, because it exploits human error instead of system error.

“With people just being busy and maybe not very carefully checking some of the emails or the phone calls that they get, can be something unfortunately that people can fall victim to,” said Moran.

Also known as social engineering, this often takes the form of phishing, where the hacker tries to “fish” the information out of you by impersonating family, friends, or even your bank.

There’s also baiting, where the hacker baits you with something of value. Remember the Nigerian prince scam?

That’s a famous example of baiting. There’s also pretexting, where the hacker will claim the victim has already been hacked, and that the hacker can fix it if you just send over your passwords. So, what can you do?

“Just as a rule of thumb, instead of clicking on links and emails, just go to the website yourself. And that will prevent, a lot of these types of attacks from happening,” explained Moran.

Phishing can take many forms.

Spear phishing targets people with access to confidential information, often to get access into an entire business, and whale phishing targets CEOs or political figures.

Search engine phishing is when hackers create fake websites promising services or goods you’ll never receive.

Angler phishing is when hackers create fake social media accounts impersonating famous people or companies.

Finally, vishing and smishing is phishing done through phone calls and texts respectively.

 

 

 

 

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Business

FG Enrolls 59,786 Inmates on NIN Platform

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Federal government  has said that it has successfully captured 59,786 inmates, representing approximately 74 percent of the total prison population into the National Identity Number (NIN) database.

FG Enrolls 59,786 Inmates on NIN Platform

This figure is based on a total of 80,879 inmates across 256 custodial centres across the country.

Abubakar Umar, spokesman, Nigerian Correctional Service (NCoS), Deputy Controller of Corrections, who made this disclosure in a statement issued on Sunday in Abuja, dismissed recent media reports alleging that the NIN registration had yet to begin in custodial centres.

Umar described such report as misleading, inaccurate, and not representative of the current situation.

According to Umar, the NIN registration exercise within the correctional facilities was ongoing and has achieved substantial progress.

He credited the achievement to collaboration between the NCoS and the National Identity Management Commission (NIMC), which has enabled successful enrollment of majority of inmates into the national identity database.

According to him, “As of June 7, 2025, a total of 59,786 inmates, roughly 74 percent cent of the total inmate population have been captured on the NIMC platform,” Umar said.

“Efforts are ongoing to register the remaining inmates, and necessary mechanisms have been established to ensure the seamless completion of the process.”

He emphasised that the assertion that NIN registration has not started in custodial centres was factually incorrect and overlooks the extensive work already carried out.

The Service reaffirmed its commitment to integrating all inmates into national data systems, including NIN registration, as part of broader efforts to support rehabilitation, reintegration, and digital inclusion for individuals in custody.

Umar also urged media outlets to confirm their information with appropriate authorities before publication to prevent the spread of misinformation that could undermine the Service’s progress and public understanding.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending