Connect with us

Telecom

Gwandu Urges African Countries to Unite for 600MHz Spectrum Allocations

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Dr. Bashir Gwandu, former Acting Executive Vice Chairman and CEO, Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) and former EVC/CEO, National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure (NASENI), has urged African countries to unite and work together to secure 600megahertz (MHz) band spectrum allocations.

The independent telecom expert stated this at the just concluded 9th Sub-Sahara Spectrum Management Conference 2024, held in Nairobi, Kenya on 6-7 November, organised by Forum Global on the third theme: “From WRC-23 to WRC-27- Emerging Landscapes  & Technologies and the Path Ahead.”

Dr. Gwandu who held various chairmanship positions at the both the ITU and Commonwealth including the ITU Radiocommunications Advisory Group (the RAG), The Joint Task Group, and Commonwealth ITU Group (CIG), made the call during his opening remarks on the 600MHz spectrum discussions.

While making a presentation on the session: “The shape of Post-WRC spectrum ecosystems”, he called for cooperation among African countries at the forthcoming World Radiocommunications Conference 2027 (WRC-27) to enter Footnote 5.307A, which are radio regulations used to make spectrum allocation for a country or some countries.

Dr. Gwandu who played a key role in founding the ATU (African Telecommunications Union) WRC coordination meetings had expressed disappointment that the continent’s focus on collaborative efforts was waning.

At the core of the discussions was the 600MHz (3GGP n71) band, a key frequency range that many countries worldwide are increasingly allocating for IMT to support 4G and 5G networks.  While several nations in Regions 2 and 3, as well as some in ITU Region 1, have designated this band for mobile, some African countries are not yet ready to make the switch to co-primary allocation.

Eleven African countries had sought request at the WRC-23 for primary mobile allocation of spectrum and IMT identification in the 614-694MHz band, but only Egypt was granted while countries like Rwanda, Guinea, Benin Republic, and Cameroon, blocked requests from 10 other African nations with similar aspirations.

The 10 countries that were blocked include Nigeria, Senegal, Mauritania, Libya, Chad, Gambia, Sudan, Namibia, Somalia, and Tanzania.  Dr Gwandu posited that fighting for status quo to remain or ‘No Change’ in this case is akin to refusing an available front seat and fighting for a back seat.

“Therefore, colleagues, something clearly went wrong at WRC23, and we as Africans need to address it. We must work together, have positive dialogue on challenges, and optimize the use of opportunities.

“Reasonable countries have always found solutions to accommodate needs of their neighbours instead of blocking them,” he said, urging African Telecommunication Union (ATU) to remain effective by following its rules.

He said the 600MHz band issue is clear: the world is moving towards IMT in this band, with some countries ready now and others later. “Eventually, most of us will adopt it. Many region 2 and Region 3 countries have taken primary allocation to mobile in the band, and even in region 1, a number of countries have already changed the use status of this band to include either primary or secondary mobile,” he said.

Dr. Gwandu urged that those not ready not to obstruct others that are prepared to move forward. Countries develop at different rates, and the ITU Resolution 26 that requires consent before amending footnotes is intended to promote harmonization, not to delay a clear direction, or block progress, he said, adding that there is need to provide regulatory certainty to different industries.

According to him, if many countries in other regions and Africa have not taken the steps to upgrade the mobile service in the band, “then yes, we can try to convince colleagues in Africa to hold, but, this is not the case. The direction is now clear – 600MHz band will be allocated on primary basis to mobile. It is almost black and white,” he added.

“When we meet as a family, we must be honest with ourselves. Some of us who helped to initiate the ATU WRC coordination meetings are disheartened by how we, as Africans, continue to fight each other in order to win the occupancy of the back seat, whilst neglecting each other’s interests.

“When making decisions, we must consider the unique circumstances of each country, such as geographical size, population and data demand, the capital expenditure required for coverage, the dispersed nature of our rural settlements, the 50 per cent urban to rural connectivity-divide in Africa and the energy costs to power the high throughput systems in rural areas,” he added.

The telecom guru said these factors differ for each country, and thus the frequency allocation solution for a smaller country like Rwanda or Benin cannot be the same for larger nations like Nigeria or Namibia.


Kindly share this post

Dear Reader, Your support matters. But we believe that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. That is why, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and finance and how they affect lives. Our incisive and analytical view of how technology news affects the daily life help individuals and organizations make up their minds. Quality journalism costs money. Today, we're asking that you support us to do more. Kindly support our effort to deliver technology and finance journalism to everyone in the world. Donate as little as N1,000. Bank transfers can be made to: UBA Plc 1017156876 Communication Week Media Ltd

Telecom

NLC Mobilises for Nationwide Protest Feb. 4 over Telecom Tariff Hike

Published

on

Joe Ajaero, president, NLC,
Kindly share this post

Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) Wednesday announced February 4, 2025, as the date to embark on a nationwide protest against the 50 percent telecommunications services tariff hike in the country.

NLC Mobilises for Nationwide Protest Feb. 4 over Telecom Tariff Hike

Joe Ajaero, president, NLC,

NLC, disclosed this in a statement on Wednesday.

This comes as the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) on January 20, 2025, announced the approval for telecom companies to hike services tariffs by 50 percent.

The approval has sparked a wide tide of rejection by Nigerians, including the NLC.

In an update to press home their opposition against the telecom tariff hike, the NLC vowed to shut down the country through a nationwide protest.

This is part of its mobilisation against the planned 50 percent telecom tariff hike.

The nationwide protest was agreed on at the ongoing National Administrative Council (NAC), of the labour union.

The protest aims at sounding a note of warning to the government that workers would resist the planned hike as it would worsen the poverty level across the country.

NLC had, on January 22, rejected the 50 percent telecommunication tariffs hike approved by the Federal Government through NCC.

The NLC said that the 50 percent tariff hike approval, at a time Nigerian workers and the masses are grappling with unprecedented economic hardship, is a clear assault on their welfare and an abandonment of the people to corporate fat cats.

“This decision, coming at a time when Nigerian workers and the masses are grappling with unprecedented economic hardship, is a clear assault on their welfare and an abandonment of the people to corporate fat cats,” the statement by Joe Ajaero, president, NLC, partly reads.

 

 

 

 

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Telecom

GSMA Says Telecom Tariff Adjustment will Fuel $150m Investment, 4G Expansion

Published

on

Kindly share this post

The recent 50 percent increase in mobile tariff in Nigeria has been identified by the Global System for Mobile Communications Association (GSMA) as a major driver for investment, and the expansion of Nigeria’s 4G network.

GSMA Says Telecom Tariff Adjustment will Fuel $150m Investment, 4G Expansion

A GSMA report on Wednesday, said the tariff adjustment is expected to unlock more than $150 million in fresh investment, pushing 4G coverage from 90 percent to 94 percent of the population and expanding mobile internet access to an estimated 9 million additional Nigerians.

“The increase in tariffs is projected to generate over $150 million in new investment, allowing for the extension of 4G coverage to 94 percent of the population.

“This will bring nearly nine million more people within reach of mobile internet, with close to two million expected to adopt the service, particularly in rural areas,” GSMA Intelligence stated.

GSMA emphasised that this development is a pivotal step in fortifying Nigeria’s telecom infrastructure and enhancing digital access.

The organisation projects that beyond network expansion, the influx of investment will have a ripple effect on the broader economy.

Enhanced mobile infrastructure and a surge in digital adoption are expected to drive Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) up by 2 percentage points by 2028, create nearly two million new jobs, and contribute an additional N1.6 trillion in tax revenue.

The expanded connectivity is also expected to spur advancements in emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT), with potential benefits for key sectors like agriculture, healthcare, and transportation.

Angela Wamola, head, Sub-Saharan Africa, GSMA, highlighted the critical role of the tariff adjustment in fostering long-term economic growth.

“This decision by the NCC is a game-changer for Nigeria’s digital landscape. By encouraging sustainable investment, we are not only improving service quality for consumers but also creating opportunities for innovation and economic expansion,” she noted.

However, Wamola underscored the need for complementary policy reforms to maximise the benefits of the tariff hike. “

To fully realise the potential of this policy, additional measures such as streamlining Right of Way permits, enforcing a Critical National Infrastructure plan, and alleviating the tax burden on the telecom sector must be prioritized,” she urged.

GSMA is pushing for regulatory improvements to accelerate digital penetration, citing success stories from Kenya and South Africa, where similar reforms have enhanced digital inclusion and economic growth. The organization reaffirmed its commitment to working with the Nigerian government and industry stakeholders to ensure the country fully leverages its digital potential.

 

 

 

 

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Telecom

Telcos Wax Worriedly over Annual Due Review by FRC

Published

on

Gbenga Adebayo, chairman, ALTON
Kindly share this post

Association of licensed Telecom Companies of Nigeria (ALTON), umbrella body of telecom operators in the country, has raised the alarm over the review of annual payment structure under the Financial Reporting Council Amendment Act 2023 (FRC Act), warning that its implementation will hurt telecom operators.

Telcos Wax Worriedly over Annual Due Review by FRC

The group warned that “the new structure would pose significant challenges for our members, especially in light of the prevailing harsh economic conditions in the country”.

A letter addressed to Dr Rabiu Olowo, executive secretary/CEO, Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria, dated September 13, 2024 and jointly endorsed by Gbenga Adebayo, chairman, and Gbolahan Awonuga, executive secretary of ALTON respectively, highlighted the concern of the reviewed annual payment structure.

“ALTON writes to express its deep concerns regarding the recent review of the annual payment structure under the Financial Reporting Council Amendment Act 2023 (FRC Act) particularly as it relates to non-quoted public interest companies.

As you are aware, the new payment structure is based on a percentage of the annual turnover of our member companies, rather than the previous maximum cap of N1 million that was payable under the Act. Section 33(1)(d) of the Act now requires private companies to pay their annual dues based on the computation below: 0.02% of annual turnover of N25 million and below; 0.025% of annual turnover of more than N25 million but not more than N50 million; 0.03% of annual turnover of more than N50million but not more than N500 million; 0.04% of annual turnover of more than N500 million but not more than N1 billion; 0.045% of annual turnover of more than N1 billion but not more than N10 billion; and 0.05% of annual turnover of more than N10 billion.

“On the other hand, Section 33(1) (c) of the Act determines the annual dues payable by quoted companies with reference to a percentage of their market capitalization up to a pre-determined lower amount, which is more favourable to publicly quoted entities compared to the non-publicly quoted entities.  For example, a publicly quoted company with market capitalization of N1 trillion will be required to pay N25 million as annual dues, whilst a non-publicly quoted company will be required to pay 0.05 percent of N1 trillion amounting to N500million. We are concerned about the huge disparity in the amounts payable as annual fees by entities having the same turnover figure deserves to be addressed in the face of the harsh operating environment in the country.

“While we understand the rationale behind this review, we believe that implementing the new structure would pose significant challenges for our members, especially in light of the prevailing harsh economic conditions in the country. The telecommunications industry in Nigeria has been facing numerous headwinds, including rising operating costs and foreign exchange fluctuations. The current payment structure will place an undue burden on our members, potentially impacting their ability to maintain operations and continue providing critical services to the Nigerian public,” ALTON wrote.

The group noted that when considering the balance between enforcing the law and the need for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), as well as the demand for bridging the telecom infrastructure deficit to enhance digital penetration, it urged the FRC to consider adopting alternative computation for companies within the telecommunications industry.

“We respectfully urge the FRC to consider the following suggestions as alternatives: Computation of annual dues based on profit and not revenue.

“By virtue of the nature of the telecommunications industry, our members deploy significant capital towards carrying out their operations and bridging the telecommunications gap within the country. As such, there is a great disparity between the revenue of these companies and the profit which they declare. For example, a company might have a turnover of N200 billion and declare a profit of only N15 billion and it would be unfair for such a company to pay FRC dues based on its revenue. We consequently request that the FRC uses its good office to consider computation of the annual dues for companies within the telecommunications industry, based on their profit as opposed to revenue,” ALTON suggested.

Another suggestion was the reintroduction of a pre-determined cap on the FRC dues.

“We note that the new Act in Section 33 (1)(c) computes the annual dues payable by public companies based on their market capitalization but subject to a pre-determined cap. For example, a public company with a market capitalization of N500 billion will either pay 0.0025% of this amount or N20 million, whichever is lower. On the other hand, a private company with the same revenue will pay N250 million. This disparity is significant and unfair to private companies. In the interest of fairness, we urge your good office to consider reintroducing a pre-determined cap on the dues payable by non- quoted public interest entities, similar to that which is applicable to public companies.

“In the light of the foregoing, ALTON respectfully request you to use your good office to change the basis of computing the annual dues payable based on either of the option mentioned above.   We are committed to working constructively with the FRC to find a mutually acceptable resolution to this matter. We would be more than willing to arrange a meeting with your office to discuss this issue in detail and explore alternative solutions or payment arrangements that would be more manageable for our member companies.

“We firmly believe that a collaborative approach would be in the best interest of the industry, the regulatory environment, and the overall economic well-being of the country,” ALTON stated.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending