E-Financial
Leatherback Moves to Make Global Transactions Fast, Secure

New “neo bank”, Leatherback, has announced that it is poised to disrupt the financial services sector with its one account, multiple currency solution that allows businesses and individuals to conduct global transactions easily, quickly and securely.
In a statement, the company’s Founder and CEO, Ibrahim Toyeeb, said the introduction of Leatherback to the global market is underpinned by a desire to democratise banking and provide opportunities for borderless global trade and commerce.
According to him, “It’s no secret that emerging markets are the principal drivers of global growth. Given this reality – and the fact that the COVID-19 pandemic has imposed numerous restrictions on travel and commerce – Leatherback was formed to simplify global trade for people and operations everywhere, allowing them to seamlessly move money from one continent to the next.
“In this respect, Leatherback provides a much-needed solution for exporters and importers, immigrant-owned businesses, international students, the migrant population in general, tourists and multi-nationals with foreign operations that require financial solutions, payments or foreign exchange.Leatherback is inspired by the leatherback sea turtle, a nomadic creature that roams the seas from the northern regions of the arctic, to as far south as the pacific, without self-imposed restrictions to hinder its movements.”
“Like its namesake, the fintech operation is built on the same principles. It offers multi-currency accounts with the option to exchange currency instantly across multiple countries, including the United Kingdom, Canada, India, Nigeria, Egypt, Uganda, Tanzania, Angola, South Africa, the UAE, Denmark, Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire. The organisation enables clients to create local and foreign accounts to give them the option to remit funds across 40 countries, while businesses can invoice and collect directly in over 13 currencies.
“Notably, Leatherback is fully regulated by the FCA in the UK, Fintrac in Canada, the Central Bank of Nigeria and other regulatory authorities in the 13 countries it is licenced in. “Ensuring our users operate in a secure space is non-negotiable. The multi-layered cybersecurity measures we have deployed are aimed at safeguarding their money and providing them with peace of mind, ”Toyeeb said.
He added, “At the core of Leatherback is the ability to break down payment barriers, promote business expansion, remove barriers to business growth, and build a global digital payments infrastructure that harnesses the rise of digitisation.While it may seem implausible that users can set up accounts, make currency conversions and global payments within minutes, Leatherback has done just that.
“A zero-balance start-up fee and highly competitive rates provide further compelling reasons to join the Leatherback fold.While Leatherback allows for ease of making and receiving payments around the world, it also integrates invoicing and payroll services, tax management services, and revenue management.”
Leatherback, he added, “is a game-changer in the industry. By using Leatherback’s networks, account holders can spend abroad in the local currencies from the comfort of their offices or homes, at competitive exchange rates.
“Through its collections application programming interface (API), clients can accept money globally – in-store or online – from more customers, in their preferred countries, and in small or large volumes. In addition, trade finance unlocks working capital for short- and long-term business goals, business continuity and disaster recovery.”
“With its deep understanding of local markets and global finance, Leatherback’s main objective is to remove borders from transacting, so that people and businesses are encouraged to be ambitious and provide their services freely, making and collecting payments with ease around the world. “We believe in side-stepping convention to continuously find better ways to make things happen,” concludes Toyeeb.
E-Financial
Access Bank Faces Charges over Alleged Diversion of N826m

Access Bank Plc and one of its employees are enmeshed in legal troubles after a four-count charge was filed against them at the Federal High Court over the alleged diversion of N825.9 million in state funds into a fraudulent account.
According to Premium Times, the e charges, filed by the federal government, followed an investigation by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).
The charges, filed at the Sokoto Judicial Division, accused Abdulmalik Abubakar, a relationship manager at Access Bank’s Sokoto branch, and the bank itself of conspiracy, money laundering, and concealment of stolen funds.
The state counsel in count one alleged that the defendants created a fake “Internal Revenue Service Account” with number 1873016763, through which they received N825.9 million between May 2024 and January 2025, in violation of Nigeria’s Money Laundering Act of 2022 and the Corrupt Practices Act of 2000.
The second count accuses them of allegedly concealing the same funds through the same fraudulent account, said to have been created at Access Bank’s Sokoto branch.
According to the court, the bank and Abubakar committed an offence contrary to section 18 (2)(a) and punishable under sections 18(3), 18 (4), 22(1) and 22(2) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.
In count three, prosecutors say the money was fraudulently received through the fake account, “thereby committing an offence contrary to section 13 and punishable under section 68 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000”.
Count four alleges that Abubakar and the bank directly concealed the laundered funds, “thereby committing an offence contrary to and punishable under section 24 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000”.
The federal government said the money was diverted without authorisation and concealed in breach of anti-corruption and money laundering laws.
According to a hearing notice signed on May 2, the case had been moved from the General Cause List to a hearing set for May 19 (yesterday).
It will be heard on that date if the court’s schedule allows.
Otherwise, it will be postponed without further notice.
The hearing may last up to two days.
The notice said either party wishing to postpone must apply to the court promptly and provide proof if the reason involves factual matters.
At the hearing, both parties must present all evidence, including witnesses and documents.
Evidence must be submitted during the hearing.
Failure to do so may result in exclusion or costs.
It said parties wanting witnesses to attend should immediately request the court to issue summons, allowing enough time to notify them.
If witnesses must bring documents, these must be clearly specified.
The party requesting witnesses must pay reasonable fees for their expenses and loss of time, as fixed by the court.
Attendance may be refused if fees are not deposited.
If either party wishes to use documents held by the other, they must notify them in writing ahead of the hearing.
Otherwise, they cannot present secondary evidence.
The notice was issued by order of the court.
When contacted, Kunle Aderinokun, Access Bank spokesperson, said the bank would issue an official statement on the matter, according to Premium Times.
E-Financial
Court to Hear NIBSS Suit Seeking Exclusive Power to Manage BVN Database

Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday fixed 26 May to hear a suit filed by the Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System (NIBSS) Plc against the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and others.
NIBSS, in the suit, is seeking an order to prevent any institution from challenging its statutory authority to maintain and manage the Bank Verification Number (BVN) database in Nigeria.
BVN is a unique number that allows individual accounts to be verified across the Nigerian banking industry.
Judge James Omotosho fixed the date after dismissing an application for joinder filed by Data Privacy Lawyers Association (DPLAN).
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that NIBSS, through its lawyer, Ademolai Esan, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), had sued the Digital Rights Lawyers Initiative (ITDRLI), the CBN and the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), seeking the court’s declaration that it is the body statutorily empowered to maintain and manage the BVN database.
The BVN is an identification number which holds an individual’s bank account details. The number is also connected to an individual’s National Identification Number (NIN).
Both the BVN and the NIN are key identity numbers that hold sensitive biometric imprints virtually all important personal information of millions of Nigerians.
With the diverse uses of digital platforms for daily routines such as banking and accessing the internet as well as well registration for various government and many private bodies’ services, including acquiring a passport or a SIM card, it is increasingly difficult to live in Nigeria without NIN.
No one can legitimately operate a bank account in Nigerian without BVN, and by extension NIN. You cannot also use a mobile phone without having NIN.
The dispute over the control and management of the BVN raises data privacy and surveillance concerns.
“Pursuant to the provisions of the framework, NIBSS, as a designated participant in BVN operations, is statutorily authorised to manage and maintain the BVN database and ensure its seamless operation, among other functions,” it added.
It, therefore, accused ITDRLI (1st defendant) of filing multiple suits, either directly or through proxies, challenging its authority to manage the BVN database and alleging that such management violates constitutional privacy rights.
However, ITDRLI denied the allegations in its court processes, asking the court to dismiss the suit.
E-Financial
Fidelity Bank Seeks Supreme Court Judgement Interpretation, Condemns Malicious Publication

Fidelity Bank has applied for the interpretation of a Supreme Court judgement on a legacy transaction between the defunct FSB International Bank and Sagecom Concepts Limited.
FSB International Bank had granted a credit facility to G. Cappa Plc in 2002 for the sum of USD3 million.
The facility was secured with a mortgage on a property located in Ikoyi.
In a statement on Monday, Meksley Nwagboh, head of Brand & Communications, Fidelity Bank, said a publication on the Supreme Court judgement, and the claim of imminent bankruptcy was done in bad faith.
Nwagboh said G. Cappa defaulted on the loan repayment and in a bid to prevent FSB from selling the mortgaged property to repay the loan, it filed a lawsuit against FSB at the Federal High Court, Lagos, seeking inter-alia to restrain the Bank from selling the property.
The spokesperson noted that the Federal High Court, in its judgment, ruled that the Bank as legal mortgagor rightfully sold the leased interest in the property to Sagecom in 2011.
“The Court, however, declined to order vacant possession of the property and directed the issue of vacant possession to the Lagos State High Court. In the meantime, G. Cappa remained in possession of the property and kept collecting rents therefrom,” the statement reads.
“Sagecom then instituted an action against the Bank and G. Cappa at the Lagos State High Court in 2011, seeking damages against the Bank for breach of contract and for possession of the property. Sagecom’s claim against the Bank was essentially for liquidated damages calculated as rentals on the several component apartments in the property plus interest on the same over different time frames.
“In 2018, the Lagos High Court awarded judgment in favour of Sagecom against G. Cappa and the Bank, which judgment was challenged by the Supreme Court. The Bank is convinced that by remaining in possession of the property and continuing to collect rents therefrom, G. Cappa orchestrated all the losses suffered by Sagecom.
“However, having exhausted the appeal process, the Bank is willing to settle the obligation. Unfortunately, there are significant ambiguities in the judgment resulting in difficulties in calculating the actual financial liability to the G.Cappa and the Bank which is about N14billion from our computation based on the exchange rate as of 2005 when the incident and cause of action arose.
“Meanwhile, the Supreme Court in the case of Anibaba v Dana Airlines Limited delivered in January 2025 has clarified that foreign currency judgment debt must be converted to Naira at the exchange rate obtainable at the date of judgment of the trial Court which in this case was 30 January 2018.
“Even if the 2018 exchange rate supported by the Supreme Court is applied, the judgment debt will just be under N30.7 billion payable G.Cappa plc (who delayed delivery of possession of the apartments from 2005 till June 2018 when possession was eventually delivered) with contribution from the Bank.
“Consequently, the Bank has applied to the Court for a clarification and inquiry into the proper interpretation of the judgment and the computation of the actual quantum properly and lawfully payable by G.Cappa and the Bank.
“The Court has accordingly ordered Sagecom to maintain status quo pending the determination of pending motions and restrained Sagecom and all persons from publishing any material in the media as the matter is still pending in court.
“The implication of this order is that the instant publication by Peoples Gazette and any other media platform or persons contain false information and are wrongful, unlawful, and constitute a contempt of court. It is unfortunate that the above clear position and injunctive order made by the Court since 7th May 2025 were not adhered to.”
Nwagboh emphasised that Fidelity Bank remains a very strong and profitable financial institution and currently amongst the most capitalized banks in Nigeria with international operations.
The official insists Fidelity Bank is under no bankruptcy and has always been in a position to discharge its obligations, assuring depositors, customers, investors and the general public of its strong financial position as shown in the Q1 2025 financial results already made public.
The statement added that all necessary steps are being taken to “apprehend and prosecute any persons or platform directly or indirectly responsible for this wicked, malicious and sponsored publication aimed at embarrassing the Bank and causing panic to its stakeholders.”
- E-Financial1 day ago
Access Holdings Sets Benchmark in Fraud Prevention With ₦193.5Bn Tech Investment
- E-Financial1 day ago
MTN’s Digital Lending Arm Disburses $592m Loans in Q1
- E-Financial1 day ago
Access Bank, Deloitte Partner to Equip SMEs with Tools for Growth
- News1 day ago
SERAP Asks Ojulari, NNPC CEO to Account for Missing N500Bn or Face Legal Action
- E-Financial1 day ago
FG Verifies 2m Households for Cash Transfer
- E-Business1 day ago
FG Launches Online Citizenship, Business Management Platform
- General News1 day ago
FG Launches Online Citizenship, Business Management Portal to Enhance Transparency, Service Delivery
- General News1 day ago
NOTAP Urges South Eastern Entrepreneurs to Embrace Franchising as Business Model