NNPC Fund: Keystone Bank Says No Recovered Loot with It

Keystone Bank Limited has said that reports in some sections of the online media on its meeting with the House of Representatives’ Ad Hoc Committee on Assessment and Status of All Recovered Loots (Movable and Immovable Assets) on Federal Government’s $40 million funds which were in its custody, are wrong.

A statement on Sunday signed by Dr. Michael Agamah, Keystone Bank’s general counsel and company secretary, said the details of the meeting have been misrepresented in the media, stressing that the sum of money in issue, which came into its position in the normal and ordinary course of business, was not a “recovered loot” but rather belonged to the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC).

The statement further clarified that at no time did the representatives of the bank disclosed to the committee at the sitting that the bank was coerced by Abubakar Malami (SAN), attorney-general of the Federation (AGF) and minister of Justice, to convert the said fund at N305 per Dollar.

According to Dr. Agamah: “Some sections of the online news media, while reporting what transpired at the sitting of the House of Representatives Ad-hoc Committee on Assessment and Status of All Recovered Loots Movable and Immovable Assets, have unfairly misrepresented Keystone Bank Limited’s disclosures to the committee. While we cannot deny the right of the press to freely disseminate information to the public, we believe that such right should be exercised responsibly and in a manner that does not infringe on the corresponding rights of other members of the public.

“We wish to state the following facts for the records:

“The money in issue was not a ‘recovered loot’. The sum involved belonged to NNPC which came into the position of Keystone Bank in the normal and ordinary course of business. The deposit was subject to mutually agreed terms and conditions, which included repayment terms applicable to other deposits of a similar nature.”

The bank’s counsel further disclosed that the exchange rate used at the material time to determine the equivalent of the $40 million was the official rate, and that “the parties to this transaction were not at liberty to have recourse to parallel market rates, which is what the trending histrionic reporting appears to be suggesting.”