E-Financial
The Collapse of FTX
By Oluseyi Akindeinde
FTX recently valued at $32 billion dollars, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the US. The filing in Delaware federal court on Friday 11th November, 2022 included the main FTX international exchange, FTX US a US crypto marketplace, Sam Bankman-Fried’s proprietary trading group Alameda Research and about 130 affiliated companies.
In this piece I try to dissect what went wrong at FTX, and discuss possible ramifications for the crypto industry.
The Players
- Sam Bankman-Fried aka SBF (The self proclaimed Crypto White Knight and member of the inner caucus. Darling of Washington DC).
- Caroline Ellison aka CE (His Girlfriend).
- Changpeng Zhao aka CZ (The Outcast Dark Crypto Lord).
The Entities
- Alameda Research (AR). The Trading company founded and OWNED by SBF but managed by CE. Revenue earned through market making (ie providing liquidity to crypto exchanges) as well as trading/speculating on cryptocurrency futures using a high degree of leverage.
– FTX (FTX.com). Cryptocurrency
Futures Exchange (brokerage and derivatives platform) OWNED and CONTROLLED by SBF. Revenue earned through customer transaction fees who trade and speculate on cryptocurrency futures and derivatives(day traders). The trading platform was called FTXPro.
– Binance. A rival crypto Exchange OWNED & CONTROLLED by CZ. The Biggest cryptocurrency spot exchange in the world by volume.
Quick Summary
- AR and FTX were meant to be separate entities even though they were founded by the same person SBF.
– FTX had a market-cap (networth) of $32 billion having raised funding from well known
VCs in Silicon Valley including Sequoia Capital.
- AR allegedly owed FTX $8 billion after taking loans apparently funded by deposits of FTX customers.
- AR used these borrowed funds to trade cryptocurrencies with leverage and also to bail out struggling crypto companies (Voyager and BlockFI) who had liquidity issues.
– FTX declared bankruptcy with loads of customer funds gone with it.
How Money Disappeared – Summary
– SBF founded AR and FTX.
– FTX also issued FTT tokens which they gave to early investors that included AR.
– As an exchange, customers deposited their funds on FTX to trade with.
– SBF basically gave these customer deposits to AR as loans to be used for their trading activities and in return accepted FTT tokens (originally issued by FTX) as collateral for the loan.
– A report then came out that pointed out that AR’s balance sheet was basically made up largely of FTT tokens issued by FTX.
– CZ (who once bought a stake in FTX but later divested because he had a bone to pick with SBF) upon getting wind of this development announced he would de-risk his entire $500M of FTT position.
- On the back of this, other customers also started to dump their FTT tokens and immediately started withdrawing their funds on FTX. It led to a bank run.
- AR then started selling assets presumably on other exchanges to send back to FTX to shore up capital in order to meet the customer shortfall.
- When SBF realized the liquidity squeeze, he then reached out to CZ for a bail out of FTX wherein CZ accepted the offer of bail out subject to corporate due diligence.
- CZ later pulled out of the deal because his due diligence on FTX had come up short.
- FTT price tanked as FTX had no liquidity in reserve to meet customer withdrawal obligations and subsequently paused withdrawals.
– From being illiquid, FTX became insolvent since the value of the collateral held (FTT) had fallen below the value of their liabilities.
- SBF basically thought he could print money (FTT) out of thin-air using FTX as the mechanism and use it as collateral against real assets.
- FTX, AR and SBF filed for bankruptcy protection post- haste.
How Money Disappeared – Details
Background
- SBF, an MIT physics graduate and a former Wall Street futures trader made a lot of money trading crypto arbitrage. He founded AR but gave CE the reins of power when he founded FTX a crypto futures and derivates trading company.
- FTX as part of its operations issued a token called FTT. It is like airline miles or reward points as you don’t get any ownership stake in FTX itself.
- FTT token allowed the holder to obtain discounts on trading fees when they trade on FTXPro. It could also be pledged as collateral for futures trading on FTXPro.
- FTX used a portion of profits (trading fees) generated to buy back and burn a portion of FTT in circulation.
- So indirectly FTT token was tied to the profitability of FTX – that is the more profitable FTX was, the more FTT tokens FTX would buy back leading to an increase in the price of the FTT tokens (the reverse was also the case if FTX wasn’t profitable).
– Burning FTT would also lead to reducing its supply which further increases its price. This also made FTT behave somewhat like a company stock. But it wasn’t legally a stock.
– There were over 400,000 holders of FTT at the last count.
– Word got out about AR’s balance sheet which had $14.6 billion but it’s biggest asset was
$3.7bn worth of “unlocked FTT” and its other biggest asset was
$2.2bn worth of FTT that were pledged as collateral. Basically nearly half of AR’s balance sheet was made up of FTT tokens – an asset created by FTX.
- AR’s balance sheet liability also carried $7.4bn worth of liabilities (loans).
- From purely a risk management point of view, this was rather bad because AR was using it’s own equity as collateral for borrowed money. If the company became unprofitable, this would be bad in itself but if the collateral (FTT tokens) backing those loans were to fall in value, this would become a disaster for AR.
Relationship Between FTX and AR
- SBF founded both companies. FTX being the exchange. AR was the trading company using FTX to conduct its trading activities.
- FTX and AR claimed they were completely separate entities. Speculation however started to spread on social media that the two companies were one and the same and customer funds on FTX were finding their way to AR behind the scenes.
– It was later gathered that FTT token’s price was being propped up by AR. Not only that, AR was further using FTT it got issued by FTX as collateral to the same FTX to fund its own operations.
– It was bad enough that AR carried a lot of illiquid assets on their books (FTT), it became even worse when FTX started giving a huge portion of their customer funds to AR as loans which were collateralised and secured by the very same FTT tokens issued by FTX.
– Remember that FTX issued FTT tokens in the first place. So, they were getting back what they issued as collateral. Like plugging an extension plug into itself. Simply means if the price of FTT went down, FTX would be seriously impacted.
Crisis Brewing
- FTX’s primarily business was being a broker dealer. They were listing and selling
perpetual crypto futures and allowing AR and other traders/ speculators to trade crypto derivatives often with huge leverage.
- As a result, they needed a reserve of money to lend to AR and speculators.
- And because FTX and AR were one and the same, customer funds deposited on FTX were diverted to AR for leveraged trading operations.
- Once suspicion started to filter
through that FTX didn’t have enough crypto on hand to honour all customer withdrawals, customers started demanding for their funds and FTX started having liquidity issues as there wasn’t enough reserve on hand to meet up with customer’s withdrawals.
- AR in turn started withdrawing funds (stable coins and crypto)
they had on other exchanges to send to FTX. This served to further confirm that FTX was really facing a liquidity crisis.
Denials
- SBF denied the liquidity crisis and basically said everything was fine and customer funds were intact. He even claimed it was all the work of competitors trying to spook them.
- At the same time CE (who ran AR) took to twitter to say that AR had $10bn in liquidity not reported on the balance sheet.
Enter CZ
- CZ who was a former investor in FTX had over $500M worth of FTT. It was paid in part as
settlement when CZ divested from FTX in 2021.
- Actually SBF bought back CZ’s stake in FTX and paid him $2.1bn in BUSD and FTT tokens.
- When CZ got wind of the report of AR’s balance sheet and its asset makeup, he made a public declaration to offload his entire $500M worth of FTT in what he called a “de-risking” process.
- This piece of public declaration naturally spooked the markets as speculators who held FTT tokens started de-risking (selling) as well.
The Death Spiral
- With speculators selling, FTT price began to plummet.
- It was made worse when CE incredibly made a public offer to CZ that AR were willing to buy Binance’s entire FTT stake at $22 each over-the-counter.
- This further fuelled the fire that AR and FTX were using FTT as collateral for crypto loans and feared getting liquidated.
- This caused hundreds of millions of dollars in FTT liquidations on FTX and because
of low liquidity it further crashed the price. AR and FTX also started selling off the other crypto assets they held to prevent FTX from collapsing.
This caused other cryptocurrency prices to tank. A ripple effect.
- Traders also started rushing to pull their funds off FTX exchange for fear that the exchange would collapse. This essentially led to a bank run.
The Aborted Rescue Mission
- People just couldn’t believe that FTX, a company that had raised a combined $1.8bn in VC money could be facing insolvency.
- The unthinkable then happened – SBF publicly reached out to CZ and asked to be bailed out.
- CZ accepted by signing a non- binding letter of intent (LoI) to buy FTX pending due diligence.
This served to further confirm that FTX was indeed neck deep in trouble.
- The following day, however, CZ through Binance made it known that they wouldn’t be taking up the offer of buying FTX as the issues were simply too many.
FTX had failed their process of corporate due diligence.
Binance also cited risks related to pending regulatory investigations on FTX and reports of internal FTX funds mismanagement.
- FTX then paused withdrawals of customer funds. There was already an $8bn shortfall.
- SBF attempted a last ditch effort at raising funds but no offer of a bail-out was forthcoming.
Bankruptcy Filing
- FTX and AR are now insolvent and SBF has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
- They imploded in a wave of scuttlebutt and were brought down in truly exceptional circumstances.
- The fallout of this is still unravelling and will most likely take a few months to sort out. Until then there will still be blood on the crypto streets so tread with caution. Brace yourselves for more bloodbath.
- A lot of people lost loads of money on FTX. Here’s a Never leave your funds on an Exchange. Get a non-custodial wallet and move your funds there. Exchanges are centralized entities.
Wrap up
Naturally people will be more skeptical of crypto but this, in fact isn’t crypto problem.
This was caused by a few self- absorbed, irresponsible and incompetent individuals like SBF and CE running centralised entities engaging in blackbox-like business practices, mis-using customer funds to run opaque financial institutions under a cloak of invincibility with no oversight regulation.
These guys basically ran a huge fraudulent operation which could have gone undetected for a long time.
The system needs sanitization. Some regulation needs to be enforced to bring a semblance of order to the industry.
A lot of Nigerians lost money in this debacle and I truly sympathize with you if you did. These are truly extraordinary times.
At the end of the day nothing is wrong with crypto. It’s just a medium and a tool in the hands of nefarious individuals. Going forward though, always remember: Not your keys. Not your coins.
I round off with these words from CZ
Oluseyi Akindeinde is the Chief Technology Officer, Digital Encode.
E-Financial
CBN Waives 2025 Licence Renewal Fee for Bureaux de Change Operators
Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has waived the 2025 licence renewal fee for all bureaux de change (BDC) operators.
Jonah Onojah, director of the financial policy and regulation department, announced that the waiver took immediate effect.
“This is to inform all existing bureaux de change that further to the Regulatory and Supervisory Guidelines for Bureau De Change Operations in Nigeria, 2024, and the ongoing transition to the new BDC regulatory structure, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has approved the waiver of 2025 licence renewal fee, effective immediately,” the statement reads.
“Any bureau de change that has paid for 2025 licence renewal is hereby advised to apply to the Director, Financial Policy and Regulation Department, Central Bank of Nigeria for refund to its account from which the payment emanated.
“The CBN remains committed to fostering stability, transparency, and efficiency in the foreign exchange market while ensuring that operators align with the revised regulatory framework,” the statement said.
On May 22, 2024, CBN approved new guidelines for BDC operations to improve compliance and oversight.
In the guideline, CBN said all existing BDCs are to re-apply for a new licence according to any of the tiers or licence categories of their choice.
CBN said the guidelines are part of its efforts to re-position the BDC market to play its envisioned role in the foreign exchange market in Nigeria.
E-Financial
PalmPay is not a Loan App, says MD
PalmPay, a Mobile Money Operator and digital payment platform has reaffirmed its role as a mobile payment provider, correcting the insinuation that it is a loan App.
Chika Nwosu, Chief Executive Officer, PalmPay, speaking at a press conference in Lagos clarified that PalmPay’s core mission is to provide seamless payment solutions and financial services, not to issue loans.
This clarification became necessary against erroneous messages in some social media platforms that the PalmPay is a loan App, as well as individuals wearing PalmPay-branded clothing allegedly been involved in arresting loan defaulters, raising concerns about the company’s role in debt recovery practices.
He explained that all lending activities on its platform are conducted by third-party financial institutions leveraging its ecosystem, not PalmPay itself.
“PalmPay is not a loan App. We provide a platform for third-party financial institutions to offer their services, including loans, to our users. These institutions operate independently and comply with all regulatory requirements,” Nwosu explained.
More so, Chika Nwosu identified smartphone penetration, internet connectivity and innovative technologies as key factors that are crucial to increased access to mobile money services in Nigeria.
According to him, with smartphone penetration projected to reach 65% by 2026 as well as improved internet infrastructure, more Nigerians will be enabled to access mobile money services.
He disclosed that, with fintech companies such as PalmPay evolving through digital wallets and seamless payment gateways, accessibility to mobile money service was bound to expand soon.
He emphasized that with demand for affordability of financial services growing, more opportunities would be unlocked for PalmPay in the nearest future.
“From under 10,000 agents in 2015 to over 1.5 million agents in 2023, agent networks have become the backbone of mobile money operations in Nigeria. For this reason, we are more likely to see a sharp increase in the number of mobile money agents and merchants. Apart from that, MMOs will increasingly use artificial intelligence to improve customer experiences, such as machine learning, predictive analytics, and fraud detection,” he said.
Donald Ubeh, Head, Risk and Compliance, MLRO at PalmPay, while highlighting the impact of fintech companies such as PalmPay, explained that the coming of PalmPay has led to economic empowerment particularly for individual users and several Small and Medium Scale enterprises.
He noted that many Nigerians including bank customers have migrated their funds to PalmPay owing to convenience and accessibility it provides.
He added that mobile money operators were conceived with the aim of driving financial inclusion for the underserved and unbanked population.
According to EFInA, increasing adoption of fintech companies by Nigerians has led to increase in financial inclusion rate by 13% in 13 years.
E-Financial
Moniepoint MFB Says Rumours of N1.1Bn Theft by Hackers Malicious
Moneipoint has denied reports that Moniepoint MFB, its microfinance bank, was hacked and some N1.1 billion allegedly stolen.
Moniepoint, in a blog post said that the report, which began on social media was malicious and misleading and should be ignored.
According to the company, the alleged theft gained traction on social media, alleging that the company is facing operational challenges due to the hack.
“We categorically state that these claims are untrue, and we urge the public to disregard them in their entirety.
Moniepoint MFB has always maintained the highest standards for digital security and customer fund protection.
It stated that as a duly authorised and licensed financial institution, customer deposits with Moniepoint MFB are insured by Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC), with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) supervising and regulating its operations to ensure adherence to all applicable standards.
- E-Financial2 days ago
Moniepoint MFB Says Rumours of N1.1Bn Theft by Hackers Malicious
- General News2 days ago
Court Orders Arrest of Access Bank Acting MD, Others over Alleged Theft of Property
- Telecom2 days ago
SERAP Drags Tinubu, Others to Court over ”Arbitrary” Telecom Tariff Hike
- E-Financial2 days ago
World Bank Urges CBN to Sustain Inflation Control Measures
- Telecom2 days ago
FG, WIOCC Partner to Deliver Internet to 3m Homes with $10m Investment
- E-Financial2 days ago
Zenith Bank Reinforces Commitment to Staff Wellbeing with Salary Hike and Promotions
- E-Financial2 days ago
SEC Warns against Transactions with Risevest, Stecs Cooperative Societies
- Telecom1 day ago
Galaxy Backbone Celebrates Excellence and Innovation in Its People